Chic Designer

1st edition — by Patrick McNeil — Dec. 4, 2006

The Design Element

This new category of Chic Designer is a bit vague at first. I am not referring to any specific element, it is more about the over all feel. Chic is defined as elegant and stylish, and that is exactly how this set of sample sites feels. I suppose this is similar to my super clean classification, but I think there are some differences.

This is certainly a beautiful set of sites. I must warn you that some of these sites will be rather discouraging as they set the bar quite high. But this is the purpose of inspiration is it not! To challenge us, and push us to a higher level. I would say that if your lost and don't have a clue where to begin on a design these could be some great sites to look though. Lets take a look at some of the elements that make these sites uber chic.

Back to the basics

Many of these sites get back to the basics of design. In fact you will find that in many ways they are not relying on complex visual designs but rather on simple elements that have been attentively styled to produce the best possible design.

One such element that is used well is that of hierarchy. Hydrastudio.com is a prime example. The site has a deliberate and well thought out hierarchy making the site easy to skim and far less confusing. Consider how the viewer will skim the page and remember that if you try and emphasize everything, you will emphasize nothing. Plan out how you want the user to consume the page visually and you have a better chance of getting this right.

Balance is another aspect of these designs that are thought out very well. Take a look at gr0w.com and pay special attention to how the page is perfectly balanced from left to right. This most certainly did not happen by accident. Notice how the two outside columns even end at the same point, the designers had to choose to make this happen, and for good reason. The site is actually incredibly simple, and could have easily been entirely unimpressive. Instead attention to detail makes this one into a wonderful site. What is even more remarkable is that the 6 landing pages for the main sections are all perfectly balanced as well.

White space

The fine art of nothing is certainly present here. Two samples stand out in particular, egolounge and rocketeer . Their designers have avoided the temptation to compartmentalize every last thing, especially the content. The copy has room to breath and your eyes never feel cramped. There is most certainly an open freedom to these pages that doesn't even come close to boring. As they say, sometimes less is more.

Solid color

What really blows me away is how simple many of the color pallets are on these sites. Many of them have monochrome colors with a single splash color, and quite frequently it is used as a solid. Sure you will find the gradients, but notice how they are so subtle that on first glance you might think they are solid: pingdom.com and wecreatethings.com demonstrate this perfectly.

Don't loose heart if the simple complexity of this sounds tough. There isn't a designer out there that would tell you this is easy. Many aspects of graphic design may be touchy feely and done by instinct, but there is most certainly a foundation of basics which can always produce fantastic results.

divider

Sample Usage

divider

Links

Genopal (Color pallet creation software)

COLOURlovers (Excellent color pallet collections)

Kuler - pallet builder from Adobe /

ColorBlender.com (The best tool I have found for easily creating beautiful color pallets)
Great color browsing resource (Named colors, by hue, etc)
Color Scheme Generator
Color Blender (On MeyerWeb)
Color In Motion
Color Schemer Online v2
Color Schemer Gallery
Color Symbolism

divider

Comments

booyaka sha

12/5/2006 7:55:29 AM

I disagree with the sites you have chosen - they are in no way chic.
These site are just very simple and not at all elegant or stylish. Coco Chanel is chic. Sonia Rykiel is chic.
http://www.sodiumapparel.com/ or http://www.mw-systems.com/ is
no where near chic...

look again...

Patrick

12/5/2006 9:18:01 AM

I think this category in many ways is very subjective. So I can understand your point of view. And yeah, the two links you mentioned arenīt the strongest samples.

But I still believe these sites are chic.

Patrick

12/5/2006 9:23:17 AM

I think this category in many ways is very subjective. So I can understand your point of view. And yeah, the two links you mentioned arenīt the strongest samples.

But I still believe these sites are chic.

Asnake G.

12/7/2006 1:13:54 PM

yeh sure some are back to the basic styles but why not try to be creative and run free on
as far as we can on and on ---. I wish that to be the trend
"for me" budy.

Josef Goebbels

12/7/2006 4:30:05 PM

These sites in this section are not "chic". They follow the same CSS/XHTML conformity as all the others posted on DM.

Look a little harder next time for the "chic" postings. Itīs a big web out there, and this section doesnīt cut it.

Rocketeer

12/8/2006 8:36:09 AM

Come on, guys donīt be nasty. I personally commend Patrick for his insightful article, I think that it adds value to the term "designer" and valuably contributes to the web community. Thanks for using http://rocketeer.za.net/ as one of the examples, traffic is always appreciated!

Carlos Subero

12/9/2006 6:32:29 PM

I really enjoyed this chapter. Im pretty sure it was hard to pick up the sites. a lot of people would think they are not the best designs ever....but its not about that... It about the basic things you should learn if you want to be a web designer. and even when basic..theyre beautiful.... Or thats how i see it.-.. = )

Hipechik Studios

12/9/2006 6:33:08 PM

Sorry, but I disagree when you say "... some of these sites will be rather discouraging as they set the bar quite high." Although these sites are very nice, I donīt think they set the bar as high as some other sites Iīve seen.

I also donīt think these sites represent the idea of "chic." Chic is a style that tends to connote "classiness" and is more fashion oriented (as in high end fashion). I think: whimsical fonts and graphics, light colored schemes, etc... (example: http://www.girlshop.com/shop/girls/default.asp). I really donīt think any of these sites really fit this description. Theyīre well designed, cool, funky, slick, and pop-artish, but not really chic.

Patrick

12/9/2006 6:36:57 PM

I can understand peoples objection, perhaps I am not in tune to the term chic as I thought, but all the same I think there is value in the analysis of the sites. Perhaps it is just the wrong descriptive term for the.

I tend to write more on elements and color and less on descriptive terms. Ironically I have an elegant sites article in the works. Perhaps I should publish that next in follow up to this one!

Thanks for all the commentary, it is good to know people care this much about getting it right! :)

Esper

12/28/2006 2:41:32 PM

Some of the sample do have a few "chic" elements. Mainly I believe as mentioned that the term "chic" is widely used n the high fashion, music and the art world. For me, I want to add that I find "automobile" sites are very "chic". From BMW to Range Rover and to Scion websites are definitely in the category of "chicness". Do you agree?

Make a Comment:

All fields are required & all posts are hand moderated.



(not displayed publicly)



Captcha